Uncategorized

  • Pregnant
    Nine months. I could have had a baby since the last time I wrote here. No, this isn't a true confession blog where I reveal that I'm really a woman. Nope, haven't even had a sex change. Well, not in the literal sense of the word. I doubt the last nine months have seen much change in my sexual activity either. There was, once upon a time, a fellow xangan who somewhat cattily questioned my gender back in the bad old days. She's gone on to another form of existence now. I hope she's happier there than she was here. After being gone for this length of time it's difficult not to recall the past. I notice I've been a member since December 23, 2000. It's like a marital relationship. It's all pretty in the beginning and then you start to discover things. The cap left off the tooth paste tube or the cap left off and the tube squeezed in the middle. At first you mention it and then you overlook it and then you find other stuff. Over time it builds up if you don't know how to keep it clean. Like the brown stuff that accumulates around the base of the faucet if you don't get in there and do a good scrubbing regularly.

    The names of so many people pop into my head like the flash of face cards when someone sprays a deck into the air playing fifty-two pickup. Some of them are still around but many of the old playmates have gone. Get your mind back on track. I'm not talking about playmates of the month. Do they still have those? Seems like Playboy magazine is tame now compared to what we thought about it in the good old days. The difference is that I'm tame now no matter what is available. Do people still read magazines with all the porn sites on the internet these days? Speaking of porn, did you see Lars and the Real Girl? Okay, okay, it's not porn but it does have a life sized sex doll in it. She's a main character. It's a great film. At least I thought it was. Very touching. No, not in that way you perv! No wonder I've been gone so long.

    I think that's all I have to say now. Not much after the pregnant pause of nine months. Just sticking my toe in the water to see what it's like. I'm guessing much has changed around here and nothing's really changed much. Oh, other than I don't know anything about all the new stuff they've added to make your blogging experience orgasmic. Woo hoo!

  • Apology
    The thing is I've been away from xanga for so long I'd completely forgotten that www.jamesworld.org was being used to get to this site. So, I went ahead and made a change with the domain name without thinking that it might be confusing to some folks. Sorry about that. If you tried to come here and went there . . . Wait. If you tried to come here and went there you probably wouldn't come back here. And if you came here without going there you don't really know about there. Never mind.

    Since I am here I'd like to say thank you to whomever gifted me with Premium for this site some years ago. The way things go in the real world is I'm probably no longer in your life nor you in mine, but just in case you read this I want you to know that I remember your kindness and generosity. Thank you. Though I don't write here any longer I write as much as ever. It's just different now and there are no comments. No comments has freed me in many ways. Liberation is pretty cool.

    Oh, one other thing. I do miss some of you and wonder how things are going for you but really don't want to get back on the xanga wheel, so I don't. It's not that I've forgotten you or stopped caring for you. It's a personal thing about the kinds of changes I needed to make and the impact that might have on casual readers. Now, I have no casual readers or people who read out of a misplaced sense of loyalty or comment exchange or whatever. That works better for me. Take good care and thank you for everything over the years.

  • Moving
    Who likes to move? There must be someone on the planet who likes to move. No. No fair citing people in the moving business. I don't think they like to move as much as they like to get paid for moving people who hate to move. But let's be realistic. There have just got to be some people who really like to move. They look forward to it the way other people look forward to dessert. And why not? There are wonderful aspects of moving. Think of all the crap you get to throw away. Of course, most of us are so attached to our crap that we don't throw it away until after we move it. Then we swear we're not going to do that the next time but by the time the next time rolls around we've forgotten our oath. Or what about the people who love to move because they get to leave all their mistakes behind. When I left the state in which I was born I was delighted to leave behind some really awful years full of unpleasant relationships and experiences. There are people who were raised moving. Kids who had a parent in the service spring to mind. The funny thing is they end up on both sides of the moving question. Some of them love it and some of them hate it. Are any of them neutral toward it? Kids who got yanked out of school where they had friends and transplanted to another school in another state where they didn't know a soul and had to pick up in the middle of a year.

    Our antecedents were movers. They followed what they ate and what they ate followed what they ate. But then someone who hated moving got the bright idea to raise some tomatoes, potatoes, carrots and peas along with some chickens and whatever else. One thing led to another and they stayed around long enough to put a new roof on the hut. Now we're moving back to the nomad lifestyle. We don't raise our own food much anymore. Instead of following the game we follow the job. If you frame it over millions of years it all seems to repeat. If one looks at it in a smaller frame there are generations of people who live in the same town. Most of my life I've moved but I never considered it a lot compared with people who moved every year. But now I've been in Southern California since 1975 and in this town since 1982 and in this house since 1991. Life is changing for me. I'm sixty now and winding down. The things for which I worked are either here or forgotten now. Though my eyesight has failed I can read the exit sign without trouble. I can't recall anyone in our family living to the age of one hundred twenty so I'm past middle age.

    Moving is a good bit easier if it's done slowly, over time rather than distance. We hardly notice a move like that. One day you look in the mirror and notice you've moved. The realization begins to dawn, if you're paying attention, that you aren't interested in doing the things you were interested in doing a while ago. The police look like they're still in high school and your parents, if they're still alive, look more your age than ever they did. Of course, that changes quickly too as parents progress in age. At either end of life we seem to move quite quickly. When we're born we grow pretty fast compared with the years of adulthood. Then, when we get to the other end of life, we seem to age pretty fast compared with the years we seemed to be kind of frozen in time. The thing got me thinking about this is that I've been around xanga nearly seven years. Not a long time compared to how long I've been around earth but a long time in dog years. What I've noticed is that I've moved. You noticed it too. At least as much as anyone really notices anything around here. If we make the change slowly it doesn't make many ripples in the pond. Lower a pebble into the pond and hardly anyone will notice. It's the splash, plop that gets people's attention. But some folks look around one day and notice that someone who used to sit on that rock isn't on that rock any longer. I guess you could say I'm not on that rock any longer. I write other things now and post them somewhere else or I write things that get posted nowhere else. Life is good but I think I've moved.

  • Coalescence
    Some days the good fortune that visits me is enough to make a man think there could be some higher power at work in his life. But of course, a rational man living in the age of modern science will have had any trace of superstition, mysticism or deity wiped clean from his consciousness like a hard disk that's been zeroed out. The name, James, has been used to identify this personal coalescence of matter for three score of years. Many people, as well as I, myself, have attempted to classify, categorize, pigeonhole, index, typecast, stereotype or otherwise define said coalescence. It's happened so often and with such regularity it's ceased to be monotonous. It has had the effect of giving rise to a certain curiosity in my personal being. What is it that drives us to conclude our insatiable innate sense of curiosity? It's like eating. We get hungry and we eat and we may be sated. I say may because the body is a delicate piece of complex machinery that is easily thrown out of balance. It's further complicated by the interaction between the physical and psychological. And, if we weren't all modern thinkers here, free from superstition, we might be tempted to add a third element into the mix, often called spirit. An increasingly unpopular view in a world where the religion of science is in the ascendancy. As it happens, some relatively short time after we've sated our appetite with foodstuffs, we become hungry once again. But we don't try to find a meal that will end all meals. Yet, in the mental realm we try to find a label that will end any further exploration of the subject. It's like there's so much to discover, so much we don't know, that we don't have time to be thorough.

    During the early seventies, while I was in ministerial school, I took a speed reading course. It was like eating a ninety-nine cent burrito. You got a lot for a little and it held you over till the next machine driven fueling session. I don't speed read, as a rule, because I find it unsatisfying. In fact, I'm a slow reader and a slow liver. Perhaps the reason is I've accepted the limited amount of time this coalescence of matter named James has to discover. Quality may well have edged out quantity in the race. Recently I've enjoyed a flurry of free, unsolicited advice from important persons. Unfortunately, in collecting said free advice, I've found it to be similar in quality to the free sofas left on the side of country roads. No doubt this is due to my lack of education, innate intelligence and understanding. After all, I'm not an important person. I've never published a book and no one wants my autograph on anything other than a personal check. The truth is if I didn't get email from important people telling we what they think I shouldn't do I wouldn't have anything in my inbox besides spam. And there's nothing personal or intimate about spam. But somehow I don't feel the appropriate sense of awe such email should inspire in a nobody like myself. Instead I find myself even more confused than I am usually. I can understand this, I think your associating yourself with the movie mentioned in your blog is not a good idea. That would make more sense to me if I cared about my self-image. But I don't particularly. I mean, after all, I'm not asking anyone for money. I'm not selling anything. I'm not asking anyone to believe anything. I'm not trying to be some one or get some where. I'm simply sharing my life with anyone who cares to participate at any level they choose.

    The next bit simply left me scratching my thick and stupid head. Also, separating the alchemical work from your own particular theological views is important. I feel like the caveman in the Geico commercial. Wha? Why would anyone care about my particular theological views? They are, quite frankly, beyond my own understanding. To separate myself from them, whatever they may be, would be incredibly time consuming at this point. First, I'd have to define them. Since they are almost constantly changing that would be an ongoing process. At which particular point in time would I pin the tail on the donkey, as it were? The donkey keeps moving, the pin won't stay put and my hand is a mass of swirling subatomic particles that randomly appear and disappear. Yikes! Is it any wonder I'm confused? Perhaps this is why people feel the need to advise me. It's like seeing a homeless man on the street who doesn't even have the sense to ask you for a dollar when you pass. He clearly needs a bath, a meal and clothes but he's so far gone he's beyond caring about any of his external needs. Could it be that I've meditated so much that my brain has finally gone soft? If I could remember I'm sure I'd remember that I got some free advice about that at some point in time. That if I meditated too much I'd get too detached from the physical world and become worthless. But then I'm not even sure what worthless means. It seems so subjective. If the earth were made of gold a man would die for a handful of dirt. What determines worth or value? Is it simply scarcity? Please, if you feel the need to advise me remember that you're going to have to put it in terms I might be able to understand. Okay, I'm going to go now. Thanks for reading.

  • Fantasy
    When I turned thirty my girlfriend took me and two of her friends to Disneyland for my birthday. I'd never been to Disneyland even though it was only a couple of towns over from where I lived. It may also be of interest to note she did not tell me where we were going when we all packed into her car and started our trip. Whether she wanted to keep it a surprise or whether she knew I wouldn't willingly go to Disneyland remains a mystery to me and she's no longer on my radar screen so I can't ask her. Back then, the Magic Kingdom turned me off in a big way. From my perspective Americans didn't need another form of escape from the realities of the world they were destroying. It seemed better to me half a lifetime ago to face the problems we were creating and do something constructive to resolve them, not pretend we lived in a land of talking rodents. Now? Well, now I'm not so anti Disneyland and proactive about the human race. Quite frankly I'd rather spend my time with singing, dancing, talking penguins than with my own kind, as it were. Yesterday in a chat the person with whom I was talking said, I used to share your cynicism. It's not uncommon for me to be labeled a cynic. Since I understand the roots of the word I take no offense. A quick dictionary definition for the word is, a person who believes that people are motivated purely by self-interest rather than acting for honorable or unselfish reasons. But there's more to cynicism than that for which the label has come to stand.

    The Cynics were adherents to an ancient Greek school of philosophy which held that the fundamental ethical precept that virtue, not pleasure, is the end of existence. The truth is I'm not either kind of cynic. And it's not just because I resist being labeled. I'd love a label that fit. Labels are neat. They're a kind of short hand for thinking. If you have enough labels you don't ever have to think again. You can spend all your time in Disneyland playing make the world go away. Not an unpleasant alternative to playing make the world go away in war games. Perhaps because I have devoted so much time and energy to dispassionately (as far as is possible for me) observing human behavior it appears that I'm pessimistic about people. This leaves out a huge chunk of what my life has been about. Given that we live in animal bodies that are well under the law of the jungle I think I'm quite optimistic about people. You see, I think we can overcome the natural tendencies that come with an animal body evolved from lower life forms. From my perspective some of us have the chance to evolve in an entirely different direction from the animal body with its limitations. Furthermore it appears to me the path starts off with what Socrates called virtue. It doesn't end there but it's a good start. What is virtue? Socrates said it was knowledge. But his definition of the word appears to have been supplanted in modern times so it's not what we think it is.

    An opportunity to transform into something other than what we take as a normal or common human existence is fascinating to me. Yes, we are selfish, greedy, arrogant and violent. But that's not all there is to us. We can get beyond much of that by making the right kind of effort. I don't pretend that everyone can. It's clear that some people are incapable of even generating the desire to be something other than hedonists. That doesn't mean everyone is held by the same limitation. Even gravity can be transcended if one is willing to make right effort. Rather than moan about what we can't do I choose to press the envelop of what we may be able to do. We have models. People, like us in that they too had animal bodies dragging them in the direction of natural evolution. But they took a different path and led others, not too unlike ourselves, to make great strides on that path. They couldn't do it for us though we'd love to believe they could. Their early students understood we must each breath, eat and drink for ourselves. Somehow over the span of time which seems to separate us we have screwed up nearly everything they ever tried to show us. Much the same way great art and people are lost or destroyed in the periodic global madness we call war that plagues our species. What we may achieve is far more encouraging than what we have destroyed. Perhaps it's all a fantasy but I think not. Individuals have progressed even while the body of humanity we call people has regressed. Yes, I think we can go either backward or forward. Just because time passed doesn't mean we got better. But just because most don't get better doesn't mean some can't. Optimism or fantasy? Hell, I don't know but I'd like to take a shot at the transformation and talk as many others into the trip as I'm able.

  • Diminishing
    Over the past few years I've been tracking an interesting attitude I've been sensing in our society. If it's happening or not I don't know, but as I look over my life I think there is ample evidence of the veracity of the phenomenon. When I lived in Guatemala it became clear to me the culture there had an entirely different attitude toward the elderly. As I've not collected any scientific data concerning this concept this whole point of view is subjective. Of course, this doesn't mean it's not so. It only means I can't prove it in court. You be the judge. There weren't a lot of old age homes in Guatemala. Actually, I never really saw many in any of the countries of Latin America I visited. Parents and grandparents lived with their children. At first I thought it was because they were too poor to have a choice. Something I've come to think is an American point of view, but not exclusively. I'm confident there are other finance based cultures share the concept. They all had to live together. But the more I got involved with families in a personal way the more I began to see a bond of love and respect which has become rare in our country. One somewhat crude way to define what I'm talking about is, if we can't screw then you're not much value to me. It's not just an age based prejudice but it seems to be related more to physical appeal.

    As I've matured my tastes have changed. There's a sexual taboo about older people being in relationships with people many years younger. Think about dirty old men for a minute and you'll get the idea. Of course, now we've got a rash of female high school and junior high school teachers having sexual trysts with their students. It's a little more okay for an older woman to have sex with a younger male. Women don't seem to appear as predatory in the collective unconscious of America. How many people think twice about talking to little boys and little girls in stores these days because of the perception that adults are sexually preying on children? I'm not arguing for or against what people feel they need to do to protect their children in our society. I'm speaking of the differences I've noted over the years. More people appear to be more uptight than once they did. Of course I'm speaking in general as it's pretty silly to try to be specific about a population as large as that of the United States of America. Advertisers target age groups. We've got Dennis Hopper pitching my generation about investments and retirement. Cadillac plays music of the sixties in one of their car ads aimed at the Baby Boomers.
    It's no secret cereal and game makers pitch the younger crowd. It's a multi-billion dollar market and we're all about the money.

    Turning sixty recently found me noticing how much I'd diminished in the eyes of the majority of Americans. I'm an old guy for sure now. And yes, I feel marginalized. It's okay for a guy in his fifties to have a midlife crisis and run off with some chick half his age but it's not okay for the blue pill people. Though if you believe the drug companies it appears men are encouraged to start thinking about male performance sometime just after twenty or so. My whole idea about male performance and making love has been transformed. eHarmony.com makes me laugh out loud. But not quite as much as the idea that someone would be willing to pay ten dollars for a Viagra tablet. All my life I've enjoyed a good relationship with the elderly. My paternal grandfather was a great friend and hero from my earliest recollection. I loved spending time with him, listening to stories and marinating in his loving wisdom. Perhaps I'm a treasure hunter at heart. But my interest isn't in gold but rather the wisdom and gentleness that can come with maturity if one does it properly. Come to think about it I'm probably about the age my grandfather was when I fell in love with him. I love him still. I learned more good from him than I ever did from his son and remain grateful to this day. The elderly rock!

  • Hypothesis
    Since there appears to be no shortage of people who know, more often than not, I'll point someone with a slippery question to one of the knowers. Sometimes someone comes along with a serious question about which I've thought and come to a peaceful compromise. What that means is after thinking about it I'm okay with not knowing the answer. A hypothesis is a supposition or proposed explanation made on the basis of limited evidence as a starting point for further investigation. Philosophically it's a proposition made as a basis for reasoning, without any assumption of its truth. The part that's most important to me is without any assumption of its truth. It seems to me to be able to think freely one must be willing to let go and sail through the mind on a sea of thoughts without anchoring oneself to any one of those thoughts as a permanent mooring. For me, thinking isn't about finding the right or the ultimate answer. It's about progressing along the path of knowledge, and more importantly, wisdom. This doesn't seem to set well with our society these days. We want the absolute truth and we want it yesterday. Then, it appears we want to fight over it and make others accept it even if we must use violence to do it. If you've read the Metta Sutta you have an idea of the goal I keep before myself on a daily basis. This is a map I use to find where I am in life and which direction I need to move in order to get where I wish to be in this moment. Since this is an inner journey all the signposts are in the form of attitudes, thoughts and emotions that may or may not translate in the world of outer actions. In other words, one mustn't judge a book by its cover.

    The question? Buddha didn't live in a world full of over 6 billion people, either. Just where are all these "reincarnated souls" coming from, anyway? I imagine it's based on the last line of the Metta Sutta which is translated, will not be reborn again. Perhaps this suggests we have been born before our recollected birth that fastened us to this body. It does not, however, suggest a soul. But for the sake of having some material upon which we may float our boat of thought let's say there is something we could call a soul. What might that be? My experience has shown me there will be many different definitions and concepts according to a person's acquired education. In other words, what others have told them is true. What they should think to be a part of this or that group. Since this is a hypothesis there's really no need for you to agree or disagree with it. A dictionary defines soul as, the spiritual or immaterial part of a human being or animal, regarded as immortal. Also, a person's moral or emotional nature or sense of identity. Depending upon which definition we choose we must end up in different places on our journey of thought. Most seem to choose the former definition. So, let's go with that for now. Is this soul something with which we are born or is it more like the physical body? Something that starts out as a kind of seed full of potential but not fully realized? Something that must be cultivated and grown. Here we have another potential fork in the thought road. The nice thing about traveling a thought road is we can cover great distances in almost no time at all compared to a physical road. So we could take one fork for a while and see how that works out. If it doesn't seem to work we can always backtrack to the fork in the road and take the other direction to see where it may lead.

    Because thinking takes up less time and space than writing I find I'm running out of space here and I've only begun thinking about the question. Allow me to fast forward down a road that makes sense to me based on my observations of myself and my universe. A soul may be a kind of second body. The first body, the one we all recognize because we can verify its existence via the five senses, we're given by life. If we stay with it it matures, gets sick and dies. Would the second body be fed and cultivated too if it is to mature the way the first body does? Since it's not physical what kind of food would we need to feed it? Where would we get this food? What about training, education? Would there be a second education for the second body? Could this second body survive the death of the first body? How long could it survive? Would it too eventually die? What would it's life expectancy be? Could there be a third or fourth body? How would one become aware of such a body? Where would it live after the first body died? Is there a space or dimension for it as there is for the first body? Of what is it made? What kind of material? Could there be a thought body and an emotional body made up of habitual thoughts and feelings? Is this something people might call a soul? Whew. As you can see there are a lot of questions on this little sea of thought. But I'm okay with that. I've got my little sail boat and I've learned how to steer it with a little rudder. If the winds of desire stop blowing I'm okay with going for a swim or taking a nap or just hanging out and looking at the clouds for a while. It's a good life.

  • Metta Sutta


    To reach the state of peace
    One skilled in the good
    Should be capable and upright
    Straightforward, easy to speak to, gentle and not proud
    Contented and easily supported
    Living lightly with few duties
    Wise and with senses calmed
    Not arrogant and without greed for supporters
    And should not do the least thing the wise would criticize
    One should reflect
    May all be happy and secure
    May all beings be happy at heart
    All living beings whether weak or strong
    Tall, large, medium or short
    Tiny or big, seen or unseen, near or distant, born or to be born
    May they all be happy
    Let no one deceive another or despise anyone anywhere
    Let no one through anger or aversion wish for others to suffer
    As a mother would risk her own life to protect her child, her only child
    So toward all beings should one cultivate the boundless heart
    With lovingkindness for the whole world should one cultivate a boundless heart
    Above, below and all around
    Without obstruction, without hate and without ill will
    Standing or walking, sitting or lying down
    Whenever one is awake may one stay with this recollection
    This is called the sublime abiding, here and now
    One who is virtuous, endowed with vision
    Not taken by abuse and having overcome all greed for sensual pleasure
    Will not be reborn again.

    *It occurred to me some might not know Metta means lovingkindness and Sutta means discourse. This is a translation from Pali of a discourse on lovingkindness that Buddha gave twenty-five hundred years ago. I recite it twice a day at the end of each of my one hour Vipassana meditation sittings as the beginning of my Metta meditation.

  • Scary
    As a rule, I don't scare easily. That doesn't mean I won't nearly jump out of my skin when I'm quietly concentrating and the dog sneaks up behind me and barks in my ear as loudly as he can. But I don't call that being scared. That's more like being startled. And I use the word in the earliest sense of its meaning. The dog barks and I jump a little. The body actually jerks or starts quickly. There's probably some explanation for it encoded in its DNA so I don't pay it a lot of mind. On the other hand, I've observed I will often get annoyed at the dog, as if it was a canine conspiracy reminiscent of a Gary Larson cartoon. What's the matter with the dog anyway? Can't he see I'm busy? Poor Buddy. He has no idea about all the requirements I place on him. Interestingly, my wife just passed through my office and went out onto our front porch. Buddy (the dog in question) went with her and the minute he set foot on the front porch he started barking wildly and loudly. Connie (the wife in question) said, Boy, you're noisy. Needless to say my ears perked up and took it all in because it was agreement. She was agreeing with me that the dog is noisy and barks a lot. The tone of her voice let me think, rightly or not, that she too gets annoyed with the dog when he barks and startles her. Agreement! Oh, how we love agreement. I love agreement. Now I am justified in feeling negative. Perfection.

    But now we must come to the scary part of all this. The agreement part. I'm not the only one loves agreement. But the part of me that loves agreement isn't the part of me with which I wish to identify. It's not the best part of me. It's not the part of me I wish to follow and go with when it has ideas. It's a part of me that loves to be right, loves to justify itself, loves to make others wrong so it can feel better about itself. And wouldn't you know it? It's the part of me which is always handing out invitations to its parties. It took me a long time to realize I didn't have to accept every invitation I received. Too long. You see, I'm not a very bright person. Almost everyone I know, or have ever met in my life, is smarter than I. Hell, to balance my checkbook I still have to count on my fingers. String theory makes perfect sense to me but I can't remember six times nine when I need the right answer. So, you see, all the time I'm writing here I'm very aware of how little I know. How much I lack and how very much I would have to change to be the kind of person I could admire. Because I've lived with this knowledge for years it's not scary any longer. It's just the way it is and there's not much I can actually do about it outside my imagination.

    What scares me is the consistency of some comments people leave when I write something. Like, I agree to a certain degree and I think your perspective is interesting and good to a certain point and I think we agree on a number of things. Or like this, I think people may get annoyed because they dont like or agree with what you may of said. Here's the scary part. Why would anyone want to agree with me? Of the billions of intelligent beings who have lived or currently live on this planet why would anyone waste their time and energy agreeing or disagreeing with anything I might happen to write? I am, literally, no one. Nothing on this planet has my name on it or ever will. No one on this planet owes me anything. Yet I am a debtor to hundreds of thousands of people, most of whom I've never even met. The people who grew my food, made my clothes, built the cars I've driven, carry away the waste I make, etc. I'm nobody and I've done nothing. See, the thing is, I'm really okay with being nobody.

  • Them
    The last time I wrote here I said, People sometimes get annoyed with me. A dear Kiwi friend commented, Hmmm.  You've mentioned many times about people getting annoyed with you.  I even remember in the early days of xanga SEEING people get annoyed with you.  You don't annoy me.  Weird.  On paper you should. I never bothered asking her what she meant by, On paper you should. I guess I didn't want to know. Wouldn't you know it? Here I am mentioning it again. The truth is I'm not quite as arrogant as I may sound. Not quite as self-absorbed as it may appear. Actually I didn't realize I'd mentioned it so many times. I figured I only mentioned it about one out of every thousand or so times people got annoyed with me. But today I was thinking about it while talking to an acquaintance of twenty-five years. We're about the same age. People about the same age often have a lot in common. A kind of era perspective is shared between them that others of a different era don't understand as readily. He was moaning about genetically altered food and traffic here in the San Diego area. Peter Sellers, in the moving Being There used to say, I like to watch. For me it's more I like to listen. So, I listened. He finally started talking about them. You know who they are. The people who are not like us. He was talking about how limited people are in their awareness of their world. That they think they're like us. They think they're aware. He talked a lot about them and how different they are from us. Because I like to listen I did just that. But then I ruined it all in a moment. Isn't that just like me? Rather than keep my mouth shut and appear to be a fool I have to open it and remove all doubt.

    At this point I hope you're interested in knowing what I opened my mouth to say because I'm going to tell you. I looked at him and said, Bob, (because that's his name) the problem isn't that they think they're like us. The problem is that we think we're not like them. We think we're more aware, more conscious, more alert, more intelligent. But we're not. Actually, that's what they think about themselves. The truth is we're all pretty much alike on this planet. Oh, there are some differences, but they're not important enough to make a big distinction between us and them. Well, Bob got a look on his face. So, I asked him if I'd annoyed him. He said it wasn't exactly annoyed but he hadn't thought about it like that before. Or at least not in a long time. Bob didn't have a lot of resistance to the idea that we were all pretty much the same here. That's unusual in my experience because mostly we're an extremely arrogant species. But if you were standing on the rim of the Grand Canyon looking down at a group of people on the floor of the Canyon, the difference in their height wouldn't amount to a hill of beans from up there. You couldn't really tell if they were young or old, male or female, short or tall, fat or skinny from that vantage point. My point is that we're all so much alike here it's just plain silly to get annoyed with one another because of some extremely minor differences in manifestation. Some folks are light and some are darker. Some boys like boys, some boys like girls and some boys like peaches. Really, there's not a lot about which to get annoyed, upset, angry or deadly. Yet we do. We get downright deadly with one another about these little differences between us and them.

    So, what is it I'm suggesting? That it's okay for people to molest children or peaches? Nope. What I'm suggesting is that we don't have to get so upset about it. It's not going to change anything. In fact, the historical evidence suggests it only makes matters worse. Aberrant behavior has been with us for a very long time and will likely be with us for many years to come. There are some things we can do about it and then there's all the rest. Most of it falls into the all the rest category. Perhaps creating the force of understanding within ourselves would help us to do something about it that would actually work. Maybe not. But really, think about it. Wouldn't it be better for everyone if we took a little more time to try to understand each other rather than spend so much time picking out the differences between us and them? Can we not see that when we do that they always come up on the short end of the stick? Has that kind of thinking and the resultant behavior ever led to good things for our species? Of course, there are going to be exceptions, but in general, isn't that kind of habitual, automatic thinking problematic? I'm suggesting that by thinking more about the us and them mindset we might be able to create a bit more understanding in ourselves and thereby give us the opportunity to make a contribution to solving the problem rather than just pointing it out and moaning about it. Sound like too much trouble? Well, it probably is a lot of trouble, but it just might be with the effort.

Recent Comments